<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>no one asked &#8211; Little EdTech, Big Mouth</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca/tag/no-one-asked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca</link>
	<description>Brenna Clarke Gray&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 03:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Technology Entrepreneurs Cannot Be Allowed to Drive Education</title>
		<link>https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca/2022/11/08/technology-entrepreneurs-cannot-be-allowed-to-drive-education/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca/2022/11/08/technology-entrepreneurs-cannot-be-allowed-to-drive-education/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brenna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2022 03:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Angry Ranting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[#AcWriMo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad edtech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[edtech bros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no one asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no one wants this]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca/?p=107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I feel like the title here is self-evident, and yet we keep seeming to circle back to having to learn it over again. Today&#8217;s absurdist example is the guy who invented the Oculus (the VR headset thing) who seems to think people would want a VR headset that literally, actually kills you if you die [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I feel like the title here is self-evident, and yet we keep seeming to circle back to having to learn it over again. Today&#8217;s absurdist example is <a href="https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2022/11/oculus-co-founder-makes-a-vr-headset-that-can-literally-kill-you/">the guy who invented the Oculus (the VR headset thing) who seems to think people would want a VR headset <em>that literally, actually kills you if you die in the game</em></a><em>.</em> If you&#8217;re like, &#8220;Why would anyone ever want this?&#8221; &#8212; good instincts. Surely no one would. And indeed, it&#8217;s possibly related to the in-world timeline of an animé series about the same concept. But let&#8217;s be clear on one thing: the guy who invented the Oculus has thought through how a VR helmet could murder you and has a prototype hanging on his wall. Tech Bros, man. These people are sociopaths.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It makes me think about a lot of EdTech, honestly &#8212; these feature rollouts for more and more and more and more surveillance that no one actually asked for. Great, I get to know what time my learner usually opens their word processor. I never asked for this, and no one is teaching me how to use this data. Sure, it&#8217;s not a VR helmet that kills you, but it opens the door to potential bias. And again, much like the opportunity (?) to die inside a game, it&#8217;s not something anyone actually asked for.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Meta just got legs and this guy wants to take your head off.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Virtual Reality has been the &#8220;next big thing&#8221; in Educational Technologies for as long as I&#8217;ve been in the discipline and longer, and most of it is really bad. Like, the number of times I have seen the most straight-ahead lecture replicated, but I don&#8217;t know, we&#8217;re in space now, and we&#8217;re all supposed to pretend its innovative. If I could VR my way into a Magic-School-Bus-style fieldtrip, you could probably talk me into it. But investing in a VR headset so some guy can lecture at me, but from a cloud? Nah.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">It feels like the educational equivalent of making fetch happen.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">I actually kind of want to channel <a href="https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262546065/teaching-machines/">my inner Audrey Watters here to reflect on how positively Skinnerian</a> this whole thing sounds. Someone somewhere is building a VR headset that shocks a kid if they close their eyes for too long. You know I&#8217;m right.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Anyway, while Joe Oculus there was explaining why I should pay him money to very literally explode my brain for me, I got to thinking about how much power we give technology entrepreneurs in education when they are walking around saying ideas like this with their whole chests. Like. I don&#8217;t understand why we don&#8217;t look at stories like this and laugh these folks out of the room when they offer us engagement clickers that also take attendance (I didn&#8217;t ask) or a productivity score for every student (I didn&#8217;t ask) or an AI-graded essay tool (why am I asking students to write an essay I don&#8217;t want to read, exactly?). Over and over again, the pitches show that there are never any educators in the room.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Get these doofuses out of the room where we&#8217;re trying to do the teaching and learning.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">No one wants to die in real life if they die in the game. Literally no one asked for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.brennaclarkegray.ca/2022/11/08/technology-entrepreneurs-cannot-be-allowed-to-drive-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
